(no subject)

Even though I've decided zillions of times that this is rough-hewn nonsense,

Jung Explorer Test
Actualized type: INFJ
(who you are)

INFJ - "Author". Strong drive and enjoyment to help others. Complex personality. 1.5% of total population.

Preferred type: ENTJ
(who you prefer to be)

ENTJ - "Field Marshall". The basic driving force and need is to lead. Tend to seek a position of responsibility and enjoys being an executive. 1.8% of total population.

Attraction type: ENFJ

(who you are attracted to)

ENFJ - "Persuader". Outstanding leader of groups. Can be aggressive at helping others to be the best that they can be. 2.5% of total population.

Take Jung Explorer Test
personality tests by similarminds.com

The questions are funny.

(no subject)

Professor's comment on my long paper: "You rely too much on your words to carry their meanings on their faces."

It follows "an example would've been helpful." Hitherto I'd supposed the solution to be more words. But maybe clarity is in showing, not saying. (I mistrust words less than most. I feel that 'love,' used by me or others, is meaningful.) My paper was filled with comments like "depending on what you mean by 'enough'" or 'systematic.'

In metaphor words are notoriously open to interpretation, yet they are, when good, exact. They wear their meanings 'beyond.' Metaphor also shows.

Writing, because it is more detached from interaction, needs more specification than conversations need. It needs to take on the form of some particular classifiable act, even if such form is exaggeration, because otherwise it will be formless.